NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B (NVFP4)

Made by NVIDIA. Epoch AI does not state how it can be accessed. No Top tier or Strong results yet among the models listed here.

Find my AI Compare with another model

In short

What it does well

No Top tier or Strong ratings on the four main tests yet.

Where it falls short

  • Writing: Behind the leaders (67th of 77 listed models)
  • Coding: Middle (53rd of 77 listed models)

What we don't know yet

  • Web-building votes: Not enough data
  • Hard maths problems: Not enough data
  • School-competition maths: Not enough data
  • Graduate-level science questions: Not enough data
  • Short factual questions: Not enough data
  • Fixing real software bugs: Not enough data
  • Difficult coding tasks: Not enough data

The four ratings

  • Top tier
  • Strong
  • Middle
  • Behind the leaders
  • Not enough data

Ratings compare only the 77 models listed here, in quarters, best first. “Not enough data” means no result yet. It is never a low score.

Writing
Behind the leadersHow often people preferred its answers to writing prompts. 1,398 on Arena's scale · Source for NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B (NVFP4) writing score (lmarena)
Coding
MiddleHow often people preferred its answers to coding questions. 1,468 on Arena's scale · Source for NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B (NVFP4) coding score (lmarena)
Maths
Not enough dataNo result yet for hard maths problems.
Knowledge
Not enough dataNo result yet for short factual questions.

Evidence completeness: Thin evidence, 6 of 13 tests have a result.

Where it is relatively stronger or weaker

This compares each kind of request with the model's own overall position among the 77 listed models, using Arena's votes. It is about performance on different languages, kinds of request and topics, not about political or social bias.

Relatively stronger

No category stands out as clearly stronger than its overall position.

Relatively weaker

Show every category we can see
Position in each Arena category
CategoryPositionArena scoreVotesSource
Expert-level prompts
Kind of request
46th of 771,472
95% range 1,455 to 1,489
1,251Source for Expert-level prompts
Hard prompts
Kind of request
55th of 771,452
95% range 1,445 to 1,460
7,600Source for Hard prompts
Long prompts
Kind of request
60th of 771,437
95% range 1,429 to 1,446
5,334Source for Long prompts
Longer conversations
Kind of request
72nd of 771,411
95% range 1,396 to 1,426
1,786Source for Longer conversations
Chinese
Language
43rd of 761,497
95% range 1,475 to 1,519
723Source for Chinese
English prompts
Language
49th of 771,455
95% range 1,446 to 1,463
5,377Source for English prompts
French
Language
38th of 721,473
95% range 1,444 to 1,501
463Source for French
Non-English prompts
Language
64th of 771,427
95% range 1,419 to 1,436
6,185Source for Non-English prompts
Russian
Language
68th of 771,418
95% range 1,400 to 1,435
1,201Source for Russian
Spanish
Language
39th of 701,454
95% range 1,426 to 1,483
455Source for Spanish
Entertainment, sport and media
Topic
68th of 771,397
95% range 1,385 to 1,409
2,654Source for Entertainment, sport and media
Law and government
Topic
52nd of 761,452
95% range 1,433 to 1,472
969Source for Law and government
Medicine and health
Topic
45th of 751,455
95% range 1,436 to 1,475
860Source for Medicine and health
Science
Topic
42nd of 771,464
95% range 1,451 to 1,478
1,893Source for Science
Software and IT
Topic
51st of 771,468
95% range 1,459 to 1,478
4,431Source for Software and IT

Bias: what we can and can't see

Our sources do not measure political lean, stereotyping, flattery (agreeing with you too readily) or safety behaviour, so we cannot say how any model does on those. What we can show is above: where a model is relatively stronger or weaker across languages, kinds of request and topics. Also, people voting in Arena can favour answer style, such as length and formatting, and our numbers do not adjust for that. See what AI bias means and what these tests can tell you.

Best-supported use cases

Where an alternative might be more suitable

What it is

Maker
NVIDIA
Access, as listed by Epoch AI
Not stated
Licence, as listed by Arena
OpenMDW-1.1
Last observation in our data
28 Oct 2026
Data last changed
29 Oct 2026, 14:36 UTC

We have not verified an official product page for this model, so we do not link to one.

How you can use it

Open weights. Arena lists its licence as OpenMDW-1.1. In plain terms, the model's files are published under a licence that lets others run it, so it can be offered by more than one company, sometimes at lower cost. That does not guarantee that any particular app is free. Open licences differ, and some restrict commercial use, so check the licence terms before building a business on it.

How you can reach it (an app, a website, a developer API or a third-party tool) and what that costs are not covered by our benchmark data. Where we could verify prices from the maker's own pages, they are shown under Price. See models, apps and harnesses and how AI pricing works.

Price

Price not independently verified

We have not been able to check this maker's own pricing page, so we show nothing for it.

We never infer subscription prices from API prices. New to “tokens” and “per million”? See how AI pricing works.

Good to remember

  • Benchmarks are samples of tasks. None proves performance in every situation.
  • Arena scores come from people choosing between answers. That measures preference, not correctness.
  • Ratings are relative to the 77 models listed here. A different set would change them.
  • Sources test models at different settings. Each result shows the setting used, and we do not adjust it.

The evidence, for the curious

Show all 13 tests with settings and sources
All published results for NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B (NVFP4). Ratings compare only the 77 models on this site.
TestResultRatingSetting usedSource identifierObservedLinks
Arena text: overall preference
Arena 'text' leaderboard (Bradley-Terry rating, no style control)
1,445
Arena score
95% range 1,438 to 1,452, 11,563 votes
Middle effort: NVFP4, bradley-terry rating NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B (NVFP4)
lmarena · text/latest
28 Oct 2026 Source for NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B (NVFP4) Arena text: overall preference score (lmarena)
Arena text: creative writing
Arena 'text' leaderboard, category creative_writing
1,398
Arena score
95% range 1,385 to 1,412, 2,186 votes
Behind the leaders effort: NVFP4, bradley-terry rating NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B (NVFP4)
lmarena · text/latest
28 Oct 2026 Source for NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B (NVFP4) Arena text: creative writing score (lmarena)
Arena text: coding
Arena 'text' leaderboard, category coding
1,468
Arena score
95% range 1,457 to 1,479, 3,197 votes
Middle effort: NVFP4, bradley-terry rating NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B (NVFP4)
lmarena · text/latest
28 Oct 2026 Source for NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B (NVFP4) Arena text: coding score (lmarena)
Arena text: maths
Arena 'text' leaderboard, category math
1,458
Arena score
95% range 1,433 to 1,482, 580 votes
Middle effort: NVFP4, bradley-terry rating NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B (NVFP4)
lmarena · text/latest
28 Oct 2026 Source for NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B (NVFP4) Arena text: maths score (lmarena)
Arena text: following instructions
Arena 'text' leaderboard, category instruction_following
1,418
Arena score
95% range 1,408 to 1,428, 3,903 votes
Behind the leaders effort: NVFP4, bradley-terry rating NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B (NVFP4)
lmarena · text/latest
28 Oct 2026 Source for NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B (NVFP4) Arena text: following instructions score (lmarena)
Arena text: business and management
Arena 'text' leaderboard, category industry_business_and_management_and_financial_operations
1,435
Arena score
95% range 1,422 to 1,448, 2,278 votes
Middle effort: NVFP4, bradley-terry rating NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B (NVFP4)
lmarena · text/latest
28 Oct 2026 Source for NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B (NVFP4) Arena text: business and management score (lmarena)
Arena WebDev: building web appsNot enough data
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2)Not enough data
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025Not enough data
GPQA DiamondNot enough data
SimpleQA VerifiedNot enough data
SWE-bench Verified (Epoch runs)Not enough data
FrontierCode (reported by Cognition)Not enough data

Missing evidence

Not enough data for these tests:

  • Arena WebDev: building web apps
  • FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2)
  • OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
  • GPQA Diamond
  • SimpleQA Verified
  • SWE-bench Verified (Epoch runs)
  • FrontierCode (reported by Cognition)

Missing results are not low scores and do not count against the model.

Where a source gives no public run log, we cannot show the run behind the score. See data sources.

Not sure this is the right one?

Tell us what you need help with and we'll narrow the options down.

Find my AI